July 4, 2022
Inter x Flamengo: Commission says the VAR should have suggested review of possible penalty in Gabigol |  Brazilian series

Inter x Flamengo: Commission says the VAR should have suggested review of possible penalty in Gabigol | Brazilian series

The Brazilian Football Confederation (CBF) jury has released the analysis and audio of the match between Internacional vs. flamingoon Saturday, in Beira Rio and Colorado won 3 to 1. The Reds and Blacks were outraged by the referee’s decisions, especially the VAR.

A feud between Gabigol and Mercado at Inter x Flamengo – Photo: clone

According to the jury, VAR, in charge of Diane Caroline Muniz dos Santos (FIFA), had to recommend referee Braulio da Silva Machado (FIFA) to review the bid between Gabriel Mercado and Gabigol, at the start of the second time, due to a possible unremarkable penalty on a striker. flamingowho was hit in the face by the Inter defender with his arm.

Center whistle: Sandro Mira Ricci sees a penalty kick in the dispute between Gabigol and Mercado

VAR: “The defender is looking for a reference with his arm. There’s no trigger, he doesn’t have bad play. He can play.”

Rule: “I warned him to be more careful.”

With regard to Mathiosinho’s penalty kick against Pedro Henrique, the jury did not say whether it considered a mistake that the VAR did not recommend a review. It is believed to be an explanatory move.

In this case, VAR also analyzed that there was no offside at the start of the play and that contact between the athletes occurred within the area.

VAR: “Obviously he’s wearing it. It’s a right leg with a right leg. Braulio, the penalty has been checked and confirmed.”

Center whistle: Sandro Mira Ricci does not agree to Internacional's penalty

Center whistle: Sandro Mira Ricci does not agree to Internacional’s penalty

Watch: all about flamingo On ge and on Globo and on sportv

– Image: Disclosure