What documents emerge about U.S.-funded research in Wuhan

Documents recently published by American journals provide further details of US government-funded research on bad corona viruses carried out in China prior to the Govt-19 epidemic and provide additional elements to the discussion of the origin of the new corona virus — specifically the hypothesis that Sars-CoV-2 may have arisen from a laboratory accident.

900 page document Retrieved from the American portal The Intercept Describes the work of the EcoHealth Alliance (EHA), a US healthcare organization, in collaboration with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (IVW) on Bad Corona virus research in a Chinese laboratory through U.S. Information Law. The documents obtained contain two plans to solicit funding, which have not yet been released to the public, to the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIH), the U.S. federal agency led by Anthony Fossie, the White House’s chief adviser on the Govt-19 epidemic response.

These documents explicitly contradict Fuci’s claim that the NIH did not fund operational gain research on bad corona viruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

There was funding for the “Understanding the Risks of Bad Corona Viruses” program, which included a sample of people working with bats’ tails and live animals to detect new types of corona viruses.

The research received US $ 3.1 million in funding between 2014 and 2019. The incentive was renewed in 2019 and abolished in 2020, by the government of then-President Donald Trump. The fund includes $ 599,000 for research on the Bad Corona virus at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

“This is a blueprint for high-risk research that could trigger the current epidemic,” Gary Ruskin, executive director of the U.S. Right to Know, a group investigating the origin of the epidemic, told Intercept.

One of the information revealed in the leaked documents is that research with “humanized” mice – genetically modified and used in research to show human tissues – was conducted at the Level 3 Biological Safety Laboratory at Wuhan University, which, as previously believed, has a life safety level of 4.

The proposal submitted to the NIH acknowledged the risks associated with this type of research: “Field work carries the greatest risk of exposing SARS or other corona viruses because this work has the potential for high density and inhaled feces in caves,” the text states.

Fouzi has repeatedly stated that US NIH-funded research in China is ineligible for “operational benefit” research — genetically modified experiments on an organism in order to obtain new biological functions. This topic may have arisen from a laboratory accident caused by the virus that causes Sirs-Cowie-2, Covit-19, and not from natural leaks from animals to humans, which attracted attention with a discussion of the most accepted thesis. By scientists today.

But some critics deny the claims of researcher Richard Ephrite, a biological conservation expert and professor of chemistry and biology at Rutgers University.

Ephraim said on the news portal National Study NIH-funded research in Wuhan qualifies as “operational gain” experiments, and they artificially modified corona viruses to further spread to humans, which could have led to a laboratory accident.

“Materials [divulgados recentemente] NIH-funded IVW funding for ECHealth between 2014 and 2019, as defined by federal policies in place between 2014 and 2019, shows potential epidemiological development as defined by the federal policies in place for profit-benefit research and from 2017 to the present. Said on Twitter.

This week, a team claims to have received documentation for funding for research proposed by the Ecohealth Alliance and the Wuhan Virology Institute of Virology from the US federal agency Darba. Research project with genetically modified corona viruses Among the aerosols released in caves in China, it will be used to vaccinate bats against diseases transmitted to humans. According to the committee, the project was rejected by Darba.

The origin of the Govit-19 infection has not yet been established. Following investigations in China, the World Health Organization (WHO) has not rejected the hypothesis of a laboratory accident, but considers the study “highly unlikely.” In August, an investigation by US intelligence commissioned by US President Joe Biden failed to reach a conclusion.