More and more parents are refusing to give their babies vitamin K.Here's why it's a bad idea:

For nearly 60 years, doctors have routinely given vitamin K to newborns to prevent uncontrolled bleeding.

Vaccines aren't the only near-miraculous medical intervention that some Americans are turning away from.A new study released today shows that more and more children are not receiving the safe supplements that protect them from serious bleeding.

Doctors at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) studied the newborns' medical records.In recent years, due to the increase in the number of children, many parents cannot go without shock for a long time.

"There may be a sense of dissatisfaction among parents who work rather than idle," news director and neonatologist Kristan Scott said in a statement from the chop.

Safe and effective

Our bodies use vitamin K to make many proteins that help us clot when needed.We get some vitamin K from the bacteria in our gut, but most of it comes from food.

Unfortunately, babies are born with relatively low levels of vitamin K. It takes several months before the baby gets enough vitamin K on its own from solid foods and intestinal bacteria (breast milk usually contains vitamin K, so it can't be treated alone). In newborns, these low levels can cause a rare but life-threatening condition called vitamin K deficiency bleeding or VKDB.If it bleeds into the brain, it can cause a stroke.is

Since 1961, the core groups of the American Academy of Sciences have recommended that all mothers should be given vitamin K at birth.This standard has eliminated the risk of vitamin K deficiency and VKDB among children in the United States.So they decided to see that this practice was happening in another country.

They analyzed data from EPIC Cosmos, a database of medical records collected from the nation's health systems.In total, the records of approximately 5 million newborns were examined between 2017 and 2024. During the period examined, the annual percentage of newborns not receiving vitamin K increased significantly, from 2.92% in 2017 to 5.18% in 2024, which is a relative increase of 77%.

Why are parents refusing vitamin K for their babies?

The team's findings could not be published in the journal Yamo on Monday because children who were given vitamin K at birth were no longer visited.It said the medical guidance did not change the situation in which parents gave up more children.

Part of this increase may be the standard MOVID-19 shorm, the authors speculate.Public health agencies are poor, for legitimate and innocent reasons.An example of the latter is the increased yield of anti-division movements increasing the attack rate, which continues to play a role, the letter Konsai-197 Manna writes Hijau is attacked as a dangerous and generating tool.No, 2019 is starting to grow.

It is possible that some people mistakenly associate vitamin K with injections.Although not for a while you are between those who call on the benefits of K in childbirth and those who are vaccinated against the virus.

Either way, it is the children of these families who are likely to suffer the most.

"Unfortunately, depriving an infant of vitamin K is like gambling with a child's health by forgoing a simple and safe measure that effectively prevents serious complications," Scott said.

It's not just a trend on children's health in America, either.Just last week, a government-appointed advisory panel—convened again by Anti-Vaxxer Secretary and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—rejected a decades-old proposal to vaccinate children worldwide at birth against Hepatitis B.